It may be a little pompous for me to use this blog as a “platform” to “educate” those few brave souls who are interested in my periodic ramblings. I mean no condescension and I hope it won’t chase you off in the future. My apologies, but some things must be said!
Back in May of this year, ABC News correspondent John Stossel wrote a column entitled “The Many Myths of Ethanol” , probably one of the most succinct and effective deconstructions of the ethanol fantasy that almost every politician from Hillary Clinton to Mitt Romney has been pedaling lately. Word on the street is that ethanol (a “biofuel” made from corn), as a renewable source of energy produced in the U.S., is The Silver Bullet that will solve energy shortages, pollution problems, price gouging by Big Oil, and a host of other ills.
Stossel’s column details a lot of common-sense reasons why ethanol is not a viable alternative source for energy at this time and, further, makes the case that ethanol should not get the truckloads of state and federal funding it currently receives. In short, Stossel says, stop propping up this technology with government pork and let market capitalism decide when ethanol is a viable option for our energy needs.
I agree wholeheartedly with Stossel’s argument and find his evidence compelling, but there is one HUGE blank that isn’t mentioned in his column.
How many people do you know who eat petroleum? None? Me, neither.
What about corn? It may be just a best-guess, I’m willing to bet that most of the estimated 6.5 billion people on this planet are consuming corn in at least one form or another.
Does anyone else see a problem here?
I must confess, my attention to this issue has been sparked by one of my own anal-retentive homemaking practices: my computerized grocery list. I won’t go into the reasons why I have put my grocery list into a database (there are many and they save us mucho dinero) but suffice it to say that I can usually tell you with a fair amount of accuracy the price of any given item we buy on a regular basis.
About six months ago, I could buy one dozen, Grade A Large eggs (regular cooped-chicken eggs, not free-range or anything) at the Walmart Supercenter for 88 cents. Yesterday, I paid $1.57 for the exact same product.
Okay, I’m sure you’re aching for a point and here it is: with a much larger volume of U.S.-produced corn being diverted into ethanol production, there is less corn available for the production of food stuffs.
Granted, eggs are not made from corn, but chicken feed is roughly 80% corn-based. Corn also plays a large part in the formulation of livestock feeds for pork and beef. So every farmer producing a cord-fed animal for the food market (whether for primary consumption such as meat or secondary consumption such as milk or eggs) is now paying more for his feed and, thereby, charging more for his end product.
And it doesn’t stop there. Just read a few labels and you’ll discover that corn syrup, corn meal, corn oil or another corn-based product is in almost everything we eat. As food manufacturers pay more for their ingredients, you and I will pay more for our provisions at the grocery store.
A quick perusal of my receipt proved to me that about two-thirds of the items I bought from the grocery store yesterday had an increase in price. This is, of course, just anecdotal evidence.
But I’m not the only person who’s been noticing (see other links below). It seems a number of organizations, particularly those engaged in feeding the poor, have noticed the rise of food costs and even made some connection to the increased production of biofuels such as ethanol. Communist China has gone so far as to ban corn-based ethanol production because of concerns about food shortages.
I’m a little miffed that in our mad dash to create an ethanol boom — a commodity that not everyone in the world needs or will use — we’re on the verge of creating a food crisis that does effect everyone (poor people especially), not to mention fostering a possible economic crisis that will wreak much greater havoc than $3.09/gallon gasoline.
While Archer Daniel Midland (ADM) and the other farming conglomerates are laughing all the way to the bank, cashing in on “windfall profits” and government cheese to boot, how many working American families are having to cinch the belt tighter for every trip to buy food?
If you ask me, we need to tell Big Corn to stick to making food stuffs — at least until they can prove ethanol can make it’s way in a market that isn’t subsidized by the government.
Yes, I think it’s time for an ethanol diet.
For further reading: